Step 1:
Add Your Appointment To Your Calendar Below
Add To Google CalendarOpens Google Calendar. Click Save to add your call.
Add Your Appointment To Your Calendar Below
Add To Google CalendarOpens Google Calendar. Click Save to add your call.
Please Confirm Your Appointment By Replying To The Text From Our Team.
A quick reply lets us know you’ll be there.
Watch The Video Below To See The Agenda For Our Call, What CLOSR Does, And How We Can Help!
Before Your Call
If Google shows “Invitation from an unknown sender,” check that it’s the CLOSR appointment you booked. Select “I know the sender” if prompted, then accept the invitation so your call appears on your calendar.
Bonus
Hear how our reps handle seller objections, negotiate terms, and guide the conversation toward a signed agreement. Pick a recording, then open the breakdown to see what to listen for.
4 reps · 5 cases · 6 recordingsKyleKit
Hear Kyle work through a timing objection, adjust the proposal, and finish the close.
Kyle · Full call · Kit
Open recording separately ↗Expand a moment to see what to listen for and why it matters. Use the timestamps to find it in the recording.
Kyle develops the reason behind the seller's interest. The follow-up questions give him a clearer understanding of what a successful transaction needs to accomplish. His summary gives the seller an opportunity to confirm the direction.
That exchange supports confidence through attentive communication. The seller can hear that their answers are influencing the conversation. For an operator, the useful skill is turning discovery into decision criteria: understanding what needs to be addressed for the seller to consider moving forward.
Kyle establishes a reason to act by understanding when the seller wants the outcome. The seller participates in defining that timing. This gives the rep a relevant basis for discussing why the next step matters now.
Urgency becomes connected to something the seller has already expressed. Kyle can return to that priority when explaining the proposal and handling the timing objection later in the call. This keeps the conversation moving around a decision criterion the seller recognizes.
Wanting a result and being comfortable with the steps required to reach it are separate parts of a decision. Kyle addresses both. He checks the fit, then explains what moving forward would involve.
A clear sequence gives the seller something concrete to evaluate. Questions can become more specific because the proposed process is now easier to discuss. On this call, timing becomes a clear topic to address. The rep has brought the conversation closer to the conditions that matter for acceptance.
Kyle uses the objection to identify what needs to change for the proposal to work. By clarifying the timing requirement, he gives the negotiation a specific focus. Checking the seller's response to a possible adjustment establishes whether it addresses the concern.
This demonstrates flexibility in working with the terms of an offer. Timing is part of the value a seller evaluates, alongside the other conditions of the transaction. Kyle listens, adjusts the proposed path and tests acceptance. Prospects can follow that exchange into the signing sequence and hear how the negotiation progresses.
An accepted direction still requires follow-through. Kyle keeps the conversation focused on the next concrete action and checks progress through the signing steps. The seller receives guidance throughout the transition from discussing the offer to submitting the agreement.
The recording includes contract confirmation at 1:07:32–1:08:05. This is the observable completion point of the acquisition conversation: the rep confirms the agreement has been received.
The handoff continues the clarity established during the call. Kyle connects the signed agreement to the next stage and gives the seller an identified contact and follow-up arrangement. That ownership helps carry the conversation into execution.
Kyle develops the seller's priorities, works through a timing objection, adjusts the proposed terms and guides the seller to a signed agreement. The call demonstrates discovery, relevant urgency, negotiation, adaptability and closing follow-through in one conversation.
MaxJames
Hear Max address the seller’s concern about being scammed and guide a two-call close.
Max · Call 1 · Discovery & first offer
Open recording separately ↗Max · Call 2 · Negotiation & signing
Open recording separately ↗Max came from door-to-door sales before moving into property acquisitions.
Expand a moment to see what to listen for and why it matters. Use the timestamps to find it in the recording.
Max gives the seller room to explain the conditions of a decision. Those answers provide a clearer target for the proposal and a way to assess whether it fits. He learns what the seller wants to achieve before returning with revised terms.
The sales skill is turning a general inquiry into something actionable. When a seller's interest is conditional, the rep needs to understand the condition. That information becomes especially useful in the follow-up: Max can return to an outcome the seller has already said would merit consideration.
The follow-up contains a meaningful change. Max returns to the decision criteria established in the first conversation and presents a revised proposal. The seller can evaluate something specific that has changed since their last discussion.
This is persistence with a purpose. The rep keeps the opportunity active, coordinates internally and comes back with a clear next decision. The two recordings let an operator follow the progression from an offer that did not secure acceptance to a second conversation that reaches signing.
An offer includes the practical experience of completing the transaction. Explaining that experience gives the seller a chance to ask questions and establish expectations before signing. Here, the seller agrees and asks to know when someone is coming.
Max addresses that requirement directly. The exchange turns a broad promise of moving forward into an understood way of working together. Clear expectations support confidence and give the next team member a basis for arranging follow-up.
A practical question can reveal the concern that is holding up a decision. Max stays with the question long enough for the seller to explain the underlying issue. His response addresses that specific uncertainty and gives the seller information to evaluate.
The relevant skill is hearing the concern beneath the first question. Company information and an explanation of the next steps give the seller something concrete to assess. The conversation then moves into the signing instructions.
Verbal willingness still needs to become a completed action. Max breaks that transition into manageable steps and checks progress as the seller completes them. The recorded submission and receipt confirmation occurs at 42:33–43:02.
An operator can hear the follow-through: the rep stays involved through the practical work required to finish the close.
The signed agreement leads into a defined continuation. Max gives the seller a person to expect and a way to recognize the incoming contact. The handoff supports the communication that began on the acquisition calls.
Max establishes the seller's decision criteria, follows up with a revised offer, addresses a trust concern and guides the agreement through submission. The case shows negotiation, purposeful follow-up and closing execution across two conversations.
DixonCase 01
Hear Dixon connect the seller’s priorities to revised terms, keep callbacks productive, and confirm the signed agreement.
Dixon · Recorded conversations · Case 01
Open recording separately ↗Expand a moment to see what to listen for and why it matters. Use the timestamps to find it in the recording.
The opening starts from an existing conversation and gives the seller a useful reason to engage again. Dixon then moves beyond collecting a price expectation and learns what the owner wants the sale to change. That creates a basis for discussing convenience, responsibilities, and timing alongside money. Listen to how the seller begins describing the value of having the property off his mind. The decision becomes easier to understand because the seller is explaining the outcome in his own words.
These questions give the negotiation substance. The conversation covers what a buyer would need to evaluate and what the seller would need to resolve. Recognizing the property's strengths also gives the owner room to explain why he values it. Dixon can then connect later terms to facts already discussed. For a prospect evaluating the rep, this section shows the ability to gather useful information before moving into a decision that involves money and a written agreement.
An owner may like a number and still hesitate because selling sounds difficult to organize. Dixon brings the practical steps into the conversation, allowing the seller to consider how the arrangement would work. That matters here because the earlier discussion established that the property takes attention and effort. The proposed convenience has a specific connection to the seller's priorities. Listen for the shift from discussing the property as an obligation to discussing a sequence of manageable next steps.
The seller needs more than one conversation to reach a decision. Dixon maintains continuity by giving that additional discussion a purpose and a time. When the conversation resumes, it builds on the seller's expectations instead of beginning the qualification again. The negotiation also includes timing, which creates another term the parties can work with. This is a useful example of how a rep can adapt the route to agreement while continuing to ask for concrete progress.
Document delivery is an active part of the sales conversation. Dixon stays involved when finding the agreement takes extra work and gives the seller a clear opportunity to review it before the next conversation. The callback then has a defined purpose: work through the remaining questions. This section shows persistence in the operational details that connect an accepted proposal to a completed agreement. The rep continues to own communication throughout that transition.
The conversation reaches an observable completion point. Dixon does more than explain how to approve the agreement: he remains present until the completion exchange and receipt confirmation. He then tells the seller who will be in touch and makes clear that he remains available. That gives the owner continuity after making the decision. For a prospective client, this final stretch demonstrates follow-through across both the sales discussion and the administrative steps required to move the transaction forward.
Across the recorded conversations, Dixon develops the proposal, works through follow-up and review, and confirms receipt after the seller completes the agreement.
FranciscoBarbara & Kevin
Hear Francisco build credibility with both owners, negotiate terms, and guide both signatures.
Francisco · Full call · Barbara & Kevin
Open recording separately ↗Francisco came from door-to-door sales before moving into property acquisitions.
Expand a moment to see what to listen for and why it matters. Use the timestamps to find it in the recording.
The opening establishes who needs to participate and what the conversation is intended to accomplish. Francisco includes both owners early, so the discussion can develop with both decision-makers present. The sellers also receive information they can use to evaluate the company and maintain contact.
Their caution gives the rep a specific trust issue to address: confidence in the people and process behind the offer. Clear communication and accessible company information create a practical foundation for the questions that follow. The sellers continue into discovery with a clearer understanding of who they are speaking with and why their answers matter.
Francisco develops context before negotiating. The answers explain what the sellers value, what they have already considered and where earlier options fell short. That information gives the discussion a useful direction.
The skill is making discovery relevant to a decision. A rep can ask many questions; the value comes from understanding which answers should influence the proposal. Here, the conversation moves toward the sellers' requirements for an acceptable outcome, giving Francisco a basis for exploring options and testing whether revised terms would work.
The sellers hear a comparison they can discuss. Francisco explains how the options differ and gives them a chance to consider which arrangement fits. This brings the process itself into the value conversation.
The transferable skill is helping a seller evaluate an offer as a set of terms. Timing, required steps and the proposed amount all influence whether a solution feels workable. Explaining those differences makes the seller's preferences clearer and gives the negotiation a more specific target.
The seller's resistance becomes information the rep can use. Francisco asks questions that move the discussion toward a more definite acceptance condition. The sellers state what they would consider, and he checks their willingness to proceed before seeking another approval.
That sequence gives a concession a purpose. The rep is testing whether a proposed adjustment resolves the actual issue. When he returns with revised terms, the sellers respond positively and the conversation advances to the remaining practical details.
Francisco works through both administrative and decision-related obstacles. The photo exchange shows patience with a practical task. The later discussion shows that a seller can welcome an offer and still need another issue resolved before moving forward.
He checks what that issue means for acceptance, then returns with a specific response. This is adaptable selling: understand the obstacle, identify an action that addresses it and confirm the next step.
Two participating decision-makers also means two people need to complete the final steps. Francisco remains involved as they navigate the documents, answers practical questions and checks that both have finished. The completion exchange occurs at 1:26:18–1:26:49.
The sales conversation continues through execution. The sellers receive guidance from the initial explanation to agreement completion, followed by coordination of the next contact.
Francisco engages both owners, develops their decision criteria, negotiates revised terms, addresses a final concern and guides both sellers through signing. The case demonstrates credibility, negotiation and patient closing follow-through with multiple decision-makers.
KyleMorton
Hear Kyle uncover the seller’s priorities and work through the practical steps to signing.
Kyle · Full call · Morton
Open recording separately ↗Expand a moment to see what to listen for and why it matters. Use the timestamps to find it in the recording.
Kyle gives the conversation a defined purpose before asking in-depth questions. He explains what they are working toward and establishes that moving forward is a possibility if they find the right solution. This creates early agreement about how the call will work.
That agreement builds the cooperation needed for discovery. Personal questions have a clear purpose: understanding the problem so the rep can discuss a relevant solution. Accessible company information and clear communication support credibility. Kyle establishes a professional reason for the seller to keep answering, participate in the conversation and consider the next step.
The value of discovery is in understanding what needs to change for the seller. Kyle develops the reason behind the request, then checks that he has understood it correctly. The seller's confirmation gives him a clearer basis for the rest of the conversation.
He can now explain the proposed solution in terms of a goal the seller has helped define. This connects the questions to the offer: what the seller wants, why it matters and what moving forward would accomplish. An operator can hear how Kyle gathers information that is useful for negotiation and closing.
Kyle makes willingness to proceed part of the conversation. The seller has an opportunity to assess whether the direction fits before being asked to complete an agreement. That response gives Kyle something specific to build on.
This is how a rep maintains momentum while keeping the seller involved in the decision. Discovery establishes the goal; checking the fit establishes whether the proposed path addresses it. The next step follows an expressed willingness to continue.
An interested seller still needs to be able to complete the practical steps. Kyle recognizes delivery friction, changes the communication method and confirms that the adjustment works. He keeps ownership of the process through the obstacle.
The sales skill is adaptability: preserving the purpose of the step while changing how it gets done. That matters to an operator because real conversations require judgment as well as structure. Here, the adjustment allows the conversation to continue into signing.
Kyle turns agreement into a sequence of clear actions. Each instruction tells the seller what to do next, and each check tells Kyle whether that step has been completed. He stays engaged through submission and confirmation.
The recording includes contract confirmation at 51:32–52:03. Kyle then connects the signed agreement to the next contact, giving the seller a defined continuation.
A PPL conversation progresses from first contact through discovery, agreement on the next steps, practical adjustments and a signed agreement. The timestamps show how Kyle combines communication, discovery, adaptability and follow-through to complete the close.
Hear a moment you want your next rep to handle just as well? Bring it to your call with JT.
Not Required
Hear directly from the operators and closers working with CLOSR.
Cade brought Dixon into acquisitions through CLOSR. In his first 30 days, Dixon reported 14 contracts and $225,000 pending.
Cade Steach
CEO · Acquisition rep: DixonWatch The Full StoryThe leads were already in their CRM. One week after putting JT’s sales process to work, their team reported five new contracts from those opportunities.
George & Demetri
NXTDoor Home BuyersWatch The Full StoryStone went from closing one in 26 raw leads to one in six within his first two weeks working with CLOSR. He also reported three contracts from old CRM leads in a 10-day revival campaign.
Stone Boss
TOP BuyersWatch The Full StoryWith JT’s sales process and one-on-one coaching behind him, Harris’s new acquisition rep put four contracts on the board in his first 11 days.
Harris
CentrIL HomesWatch The Full StoryAfter replacing a three-call process with JT’s one-call approach, Dillano’s team reported seven new contracts and more than $100,000 pending within 30 days.
Dillano
CEO · High Vision REWatch The Full StoryKyle shared a pipeline with 13 assigned opportunities totaling $153,750. One closer’s production over one month. showing the scale of the contribution a strong acquisition rep can make.
Max reported 18 contracts in a month when the entire team did 28. That is the kind of individual contribution an established operator wants from another seat: meaningful production inside a team that is already closing.
The update came about a week and a half into the rep’s start: four contracts, followed by a shout-out to JT’s playbook. The training was already showing up in the results the client was reporting.
The first-month update was direct: nine deals locked up. The rep was already adding contracts to the pipeline, giving the operator real production to evaluate from the first month.
The monthly update reports one in six leads converting. For an operator already investing in lead flow, this gets to the question that matters: what happens to those opportunities once they reach the sales team?
When asked for the offer-to-contract ratio, the answer was 3.33. roughly 30% of offers turning into contracts. A concrete look at how often an offer became a yes.
Individual client-reported results. Outcomes vary with experience, effort, lead quality, market conditions, and other factors. Contracts, pending fees, and assigned fees are different stages and are not the same as cash collected or profit. These examples do not establish typical results or guarantee future performance.